Conservative groups are working to undermine support for Montana鈥檚 Medicaid expansion in hopes the state will abandon the program. The rollback would be the first in the decade since the Affordable Care Act began allowing states to cover more people with low incomes.
Montana’s expansion, which insures roughly , is set to expire next year unless the legislature and governor opt to renew it. Opponents see a rare opportunity to eliminate Medicaid expansion in one of the 40 states that have approved it.
The Foundation for Government Accountability and Paragon Health Institute, think tanks funded by conservative groups, told Montana lawmakers in September that the program鈥檚 enrollment and costs are bloated and that the overloaded system harms access to care for the most vulnerable.
Manatt, a consulting firm that has studied Montana鈥檚 Medicaid program for years, then presented legislators with the opposite take, stating that more people have access to critical treatment because of Medicaid expansion. Those who support the program say the conservative groups鈥 arguments are flawed.
State Rep. Bob Keenan, a Republican who chairs the Health and Human Services Interim Budget Committee, which heard the dueling arguments, said the decision to kill or continue Medicaid expansion 鈥渃omes down to who believes what.鈥
The expansion program extends Medicaid coverage to adults with incomes up to 138% of the federal poverty level, or nearly $21,000 a year for a single person. Before, the program was largely reserved for children, people with disabilities, and pregnant women. The federal government covers 90% of the expansion cost while states pick up the rest.
National Medicaid researchers have said Montana is the only state considering shelving its expansion in 2025. Others could follow.
New Hampshire legislators in 2023 extended the state鈥檚 expansion for seven years and this year blocked legislation to make it permanent. Utah has provisions to scale back or end its Medicaid expansion program if federal contributions drop.
FGA and Paragon have long argued against Medicaid expansion. Tax records show their funders include some large organizations pushing conservative agendas. That includes the 85 Fund, which is backed by Leonard Leo, a conservative activist best known for his efforts to fill the courts with conservative judges.
The president of Paragon Health Institute is Brian Blase, who served as a special assistant to former President Donald Trump and is a visiting fellow at FGA, as praising the organization for its 鈥渃onservative policy wins鈥 across states. He was also announced in 2019 as a at the Heritage Foundation, which was behind the Project 2025 presidential blueprint, which proposes restricting Medicaid eligibility and benefits.
Paragon spokesperson Anthony Wojtkowiak said its work isn鈥檛 directed by any political party or donor. He said Paragon is a nonpartisan nonprofit and responds to policymakers interested in learning more about its analyses.
鈥淚n the instance of Montana, Paragon does not have a role in the debate around Medicaid expansion, other than the testimony,鈥 he said.
FGA declined an interview request. As early as last year, the organization began to reject reauthorizing the program. It also this year of Montana Republican Rep. Jane Gillette saying the state should allow its expansion to expire.
Gillette requested the FGA and Paragon presentations to state lawmakers, according to Keenan. He said Democratic lawmakers responded by requesting the Manatt presentation.
Manatt鈥檚 research was contracted by the Montana Healthcare Foundation, whose mission is to improve the health of Montanans. Its latest report also received support from the state鈥檚 hospital association.
The Montana Healthcare Foundation is a funder of 杨贵妃传媒視頻 Health News, an independent national newsroom that is part of the health information nonprofit KFF.
Bryce Ward, a Montana health economist who studies Medicaid expansion, said some of the antiexpansion arguments don鈥檛 add up.
For example, Hayden Dublois, FGA鈥檚 data and analytics director, told Montana lawmakers that in 2022 72% of able-bodied adults on Montana’s Medicaid program weren’t working. If that data refers to adults without disabilities, that would come to 97,000 jobless Medicaid enrollees, Ward said. He said that鈥檚 just shy of the state鈥檚 total population who reported no income at the time, most of whom didn鈥檛 qualify for Medicaid.
鈥淚t’s simply not plausible,鈥 Ward said.
A Manatt report, citing federal survey data, of Montana adults on Medicaid have jobs and an additional 11% attend school.
FGA didn鈥檛 respond to a request for its data, which Dublois said in the committee hearing came through a state records request.
Jon Ebelt, a spokesperson for the Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services, also declined to comment. As of late October, a 杨贵妃传媒視頻 Health News records request for the data the state provided FGA was pending.
In his presentation before Montana lawmakers, Blase said the most vulnerable people on Medicaid are worse off due to expansion as resources pool toward new enrollees.
鈥淪ome people got more medical care; some people got less medical care,鈥 Blase said.
show its standard monthly reimbursement per Medicaid enrollee for seniors and adults who are blind or have disabilities.
Drew Gonshorowski, a researcher with Paragon, from a federal Medicaid commission that shows that, overall, states spend more on adults who qualified through the expansion programs than they do on others on Medicaid. That data also shows states spend more on seniors and people with disabilities than on the broader adult population insured by Medicaid, which is also true in Montana.
Nationally, states with expansions spend more money on people enrolled in Medicaid across eligibility groups compared with nonexpansion states, .
Zoe Barnard, a senior adviser for Manatt who worked for Montana鈥檚 health department for nearly 10 years, said not only has the state鈥檚 uninsured rate dropped by 30% since it expanded Medicaid, but also some specialty services have grown as more people access care.
FGA has long lobbied nonexpansion states, including Texas, Kansas, and Mississippi, to . In February, an FGA representative of an Idaho bill that included an expansion repeal trigger if the state couldn鈥檛 meet a set of rules, including instituting work requirements and capping enrollment. The bill failed.
Paragon produced an analysis titled 鈥,鈥 and Blase this year on the value of continuing to keep expansion out of the Lone Star State.
On the federal level, Paragon recently proposed a Medicaid overhaul plan to phase out the federal 90% matching rate for expansion enrollees, among other changes to cut spending. The left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities has countered that such ideas would leave more people without care.
In Montana, Republicans are defending a supermajority they didn鈥檛 have when a bipartisan group passed the expansion in 2015 and renewed it in 2019. Also unlike before, there鈥檚 now a Republican in the governor鈥檚 office. Gov. Greg Gianforte is up for reelection and has said the safety net is important but shouldn鈥檛 get too big.
Keenan, the Republican lawmaker, predicted the expansion debate won鈥檛 be clear-cut when legislators convene in January.
鈥淢edicaid expansion is not a yes or no. It’s going to be a negotiated decision,鈥 he said.
