Doctors Make Big Money Testing Urine For Drugs, Then Ignore Abnormal Results
In April 2014, state and federal drug agents raided Jeffrey Campbellâs medical clinic in Jeffersonville, Ind. Police cars blocked the parking lot as bewildered patients scattered and the agents carted off boxes of records from the doctorâs office.
Some of the seized records would show that Campbell endangered patients by prescribing opiates without any medical need, according to federal prosecutors. Campbell, who collected millions of dollars from Medicare for urine tests run at his office lab, also failed to act when test results revealed patients were abusing prescription and illegal drugs, according to a government medical expertâs report.
Four patients died from drug-related causes under his watch, the report said. Others flunked two dozen or more urine tests, but the clinic kept prescribing them pills. One patient with a history of overdoses failed 46 urine tests and was never confronted about it. Campbell denied wrongdoing.
The nationâs opioid crisis has prompted an explosion in urine testing. The scourge has driven huge profits for many pain clinics across the U.S., an ongoing Kaiser Health News investigation shows. Spending on urine screens and related genetic tests quadrupled from 2011 to 2014 to an estimated $8.5 billion a year â more than the entire budget of the Environmental Protection Agency, according to a KHN analysis of billing data from Medicare and private insurance billing from the Mayo Clinic.
Medicare and other insurers pay for urine tests with the expectation that clinics will use the results to detect and curb dangerous abuse. But some doctors have taken no action when patients are caught misusing pharmaceuticals, or taking street drugs such as cocaine or heroin. Federal pain guidelines say doctors should discuss test results with patients and taper medication if necessary.
A lab technician inspects a urine sample at the Comprehensive Pain Specialists lab in Brentwood, Tenn., in February. (Heidi de Marco/KHN)
Medicare and private insurers acknowledge that they lack the resources to routinely verify that doctors who order a high volume of drug-related tests do so to improve patient care, not fatten the bottom line.
âThis is a big issue,â said Louis Saccoccio, who heads the National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association, a group formed by private insurers and government officials. âThere are abusive practices out there.â
ÂIn nearly a dozen recent criminal cases, prosecutors have cited evidence that doctors supplied opiates to patients with repeated abnormal urine test results.
One such doctor was Alabama pain specialist , who billed Medicare and private insurers over $9 million for urine tests solely âbecause he served to profit,â according to prosecutors in Alabama. He pleaded guilty to illegal prescribing and health care fraud. Earlier this year, a judge sentenced him to 15 years in prison.
Theodore Parran, who has served as an expert witness for the federal government, predicted more doctors could face fraud charges, or discipline by state medical licensing boards, over lab testing that appears to be profit-motivated.
âThis is certainly on their radar,â Parran, a professor of medical education at Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, said in an interview. Ignoring repeated abnormal urine tests âis bad medicineâ that âendangers the safety of the patients and the community.â
°ŐłóąđĚýKHN investigation earlier this year found that dozens of pain doctors with their own labs took in $1 million or more in 2015 from Medicare for running urine and, in some cases, genetic drug tests. Some doctors derived at least 80 percent of their Medicare income this way.
Campbellâs office was among the clinics billing Medicare the most in the country, according to KHNâs data analysis of Medicare billing records.
Campbell and his staff at Physicians Primary Care PLLC billed the government agency a total of nearly $6 million for urine testing during 2014 and 2015, according to the KHN analysis.
John Kuhn Jr., U.S. attorney for the Western District of Kentucky, in July announced a range of health care fraud indictments, part of a nationwide sweep that charged hundreds of defendants. (Courtesy of the U.S. Department of Justice)
In June, more than three years after the Indiana raid, a federal grand jury in Kentucky indicted Campbell and two associates. The charges â which were announced July 13 as part of a national health care fraud sweep â include multiple counts of illegally distributing prescription drugs and health care fraud; one fraud count accuses Campbell of ordering costly genetic tests through an outside lab that were ânot medically necessary and never interpreted.â All of the defendants pleaded not guilty.
Neither Campbell nor his attorney, Page Pate, would comment for this story. However, in an interview with KHN several months before his indictment, Campbell said the governmentâs case was âwithout merit.â He denied he ran a âpill millâ and said he relied on his âstate-of-the-artâ lab, which serves the Jeffersonville clinic and a branch just across the Ohio River in Louisville, to help keep patients safe.
âWe do a lot of drug testing for patients and we do it appropriately,â Campbell said.
Indeed, deciding how often to order these tests, and for which patients and drugs, can be a judgment call. Doctors also sometimes disagree over what action they should take against patients with âdirtyâ urine: Some doctors kick out drug abusers, while others argue that is unethical. Instead, doctors should counsel these patients and refer them for substance abuse treatment, they say.
Donald White, a spokesman for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Servicesâ Office of the Inspector General, said if test results are disregarded, âwhy is the test being ordered in the first place?â
âWhen abnormal urine drug test results are not acted upon by the physician who ordered the test, it raises concerns not only that the testing itself is not medically reasonable and necessary, but also that the doctorâs treatment of the patient may fall below the standard of care,â White said.
Prosecutors say Campbell kept them at bay for years by asserting that records seized in the raid, including computers and emails, contained privileged attorney communications. Clearing that hurdle delayed them from sending medical records to an outside expert for review, prosecutors said.
Indiana anesthesiologist Timothy King, who wrote the government medical expertâs report in the Campbell case, examined 19 patient files this year for his report. He concluded that Campbell âfails to practice medicine according to generally accepted medical principles and standards of care,â and âroutinelyâ prescribed opiates âwithout a medical purpose.â
King said Campbell gave four patients a brew of pills known as the âHoly Trinity,â which King called âa street-popular combination of opiate, sedative and muscle relaxant that produces a heroin-like euphoria.â
These four patients were prescribed refills despite repeated abnormal urine tests. Two failed two dozen or more urine screens, according to Kingâs report.
All 19 patients repeatedly failed their tests, which King described as an obvious warning sign that they were ingesting prohibited drugs, or possibly peddling unused pills on the street.
âUrine drug screens are routinely inconsistentâ [which can indicate] medication misuse, abuse and diversion,â the expert concluded.
The four people who died showed telltale signs of trouble such as admitting they had diverted some of their medicine, or had been visiting other doctors to feed pill habits according his report.
A 25-year-old woman identified only by the initials âCMâ had âvagueâ complaints of lower-back pain and used drugs âfor purposes of abuse and diversion,â according to King. She died three days after the clinic issued her a prescription for painkillers methadone and hydrocodone, King wrote. âEL,â who was homeless and disabled, died from a drug overdose in July 2014, also three days after her office visit, according to the report.
King also said Campbell appeared to order unnecessary tests, including X-rays, âto optimize billing.â
Less than a month after prosecutors received Kingâs report, a federal grand jury in Louisville indicted Campbell and nurse practitioners Dawn Antle and Mark Dyer.
All have pleaded not guilty. No trial date has been set.
Indiana officials quickly suspended their licenses to practice.
Prosecutors also are seeking forfeiture of Campbellâs Jeffersonville office building and other proceeds.
Attorneys for Antle and Dyer also had no comment. In the earlier interview with KHN, Campbell argued his practice attracts many difficult patients who have âno other optionâ to seek relief from pain. âNobody else will see these people,â he said.
He ordered tests for a slew of substances because none of his drug-abusing patients âever just uses one drug. They use everything they can get their hands on.â
Ńîšóĺú´ŤĂ˝Ňîl Health Newsâ coverage related to aging and improving care of older adults is supported in part by .