Kids can also become dizzy, lose consciousness, and suffer dangerous drops in blood pressure. In the most severe case he’s seen, doctors put another boy on a ventilator in the intensive care unit because he couldn’t breathe, said Marino, of Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine.

Thousands of kids a year are in e-cigarettes, also known as vapes. For a toddler, even a few drops can be fatal.

Cases of vaping-related nicotine exposure reported to poison centers in 2022 鈥� despite a , the Child Nicotine Poisoning Prevention Act, that requires child-resistant packaging on bottles of vaping liquid. In what doctors call a major oversight, the law doesn’t require protective packaging on devices themselves.

Refillable vapes are designed to hold liquid nicotine in a central reservoir, making them dangerous to kids, Marino said. Even vapes that appear more child-resistant 鈥� because their nicotine is 鈥� present a risk, because the cartridges can be pried open. And some disposable e-cigarettes, now the top-selling type on the market, allow users to take and as multiple packs of cigarettes.

Many e-cigarettes and liquids seem , with pastel packages, names such as “,” and flavors such as bubble gum and blue raspberry. That makes vapes far more tempting 鈥� and hazardous 鈥� than traditional cigarettes, which have lower doses of nicotine and a bitter taste that often prompts children to quickly spit them out, said Diane Calello, the executive and medical director of the New Jersey Poison Information and Education System.

“Nicotine liquid is an accident waiting to happen,” Calello said. “It smells good and it’s highly concentrated.”

Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), who co-sponsored the 2016 legislation, said he would push to expand the childproof packaging requirement to disposable and pod-based e-cigarettes.

“Every day that FDA allows flavored e-cigarette products to remain on the market is another day that children can be enticed by these dangerous, and sometimes deadly, products,” he said.

Although the FDA declined to comment for this article, on Aug. 2 the agency included a special feature about in children in its “CTP Connect” newsletter.

The number of reports to poison control centers about e-cigarettes has more than doubled since 2018, according to an FDA analysis. Poison control centers reported more than 7,000 vaping-related exposures in people of all ages from April 1, 2022, to March 31, 2023.

According to the FDA, 43 of those exposures resulted in hospitalization and an additional 582 in other medical treatment. About half of poison center reports had no information about whether patients needed medical care.

Nearly 90% of exposures involved children under 5. Authors of the report say their numbers likely underestimate the problem, given that poison control centers aren’t contacted in every case.

A from vaping-related nicotine poisoning in 2014. The new FDA report also mentions the apparent suicide of an adult via e-cigarette poisoning.

A spokesperson for the vaping industry said companies take safety seriously.

“All e-liquid bottles manufactured in the United States conform to U.S. law,” said April Meyers, the president of the board of directors and CEO of the Smoke-Free Alternatives Trade Association, which represents the vaping industry. “Not only are the caps child-resistant, but the flow of liquid is restricted so that only small amounts can be dispensed.”

Yet many vaping products are made outside the U.S., which has recently been flooded with illegal e-cigarettes, mostly from China.

The increasing number of nicotine exposures among kids 鈥� especially curious toddlers who put virtually everything they can grab into their mouths 鈥� likely reflects the sheer volume of e-cigarette sales, said Natalie Rine, the director of the Central Ohio Poison Center at Nationwide Children’s Hospital.

E-cigarette unit sales from January 2020 to December 2022, rising from 15.5 million every four weeks to 22.7 million, according to a report published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“This isn’t something that parents see as a really big risk,” Marino said. “But with the popularity of e-cigarettes, the risk isn’t going away anytime soon.”

One effective strategy to reduce e-cigarette sales has been to ban flavored products. California, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, and Washington, D.C., , while Utah and Maryland have banned some flavors. A study showed overall e-cigarette sales in states after flavor bans, compared with states that didn’t ban them.

Some doctors say the country needs to do more to protect children.

“If the numbers are rising, then the law ain’t working,” said Carl Baum, a professor of pediatrics and emergency medicine at Yale School of Medicine.

Pediatrician Gary Smith said the lack of child safety requirements for e-cigarette devices is a major problem. Refillable e-cigarettes are relatively easy for kids to open.

Although most poison control center reports don’t include brand information, disposable e-cigarettes 鈥� including Elfbar, Puff Bar, and Pop Vape 鈥� were some of the most common products mentioned in the FDA analysis. Elfbar is now known as EB Design.

Expanding the federal law to include devices would be “an important step,” said Smith, president of the Child Injury Prevention Alliance, an Ohio-based advocacy group that works to prevent injuries in children.

In addition, federal officials should limit the nicotine concentration in vape juices to make them less toxic, as well as ban candy-like flavors and colors on packaging, Smith said.

“The public health response should be comprehensive,” Smith said.

Kids have been known to pick up a vape and begin puffing, in imitation of their parents, Calello said.

Even if children don’t inhale the aerosol, sucking on a vape exposes their skin to nicotine, which can be absorbed into the bloodstream, said Robert Glatter, an assistant professor of emergency medicine at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. Glatter noted that e-cigarette liquids also , including arsenic and lead, which is toxic at any dose; carcinogens such as acetaldehyde and formaldehyde; and benzene, a volatile organic compound found in auto exhaust.

Fortunately, children who inhale nicotine get a much lower dose than those who ingest it, reducing the risk of serious harm, said Marc Auerbach, a professor of pediatric emergency medicine at Yale School of Medicine.

Only about 2% of exposures in the FDA study were recorded as having a moderate or major effect.

That may be because little kids who get into dangerous liquids 鈥� from vape juice to household cleaning products or gasoline 鈥� usually spill most of it, Baum said. “They often end up wearing it rather than swallowing it,” Baum said.

Although Stephen Thornton has seen a lot of children with nicotine exposure, he said, the human body has ways of protecting itself from toxic substances. “Fortunately, when kids do ingest these e-cig nicotine products, they self-decontaminate. They vomit 鈥� a lot 鈥� and this keeps the mortality rate very low, but these kids still often end up in emergency departments due to all the nausea and vomiting,” said Thornton, an emergency medicine physician and medical director of the Kansas Poison Control Center.

The FDA of young children to keep e-cigarettes and vaping liquid out of reach and in its original container.

For emergency assistance, call Poison Help at 800-222-1222 to speak with a poison expert, or visit poisonhelp.org for support and resources.

杨贵妃传媒視頻 Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF鈥攁n independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .

USE OUR CONTENT

This story can be republished for free (details).

Preserve all the rituals of smoking: Light up a cigarette, inhale the smoke, including the nasty stuff that can kill you, and exhale. But remove most of the nicotine, the chemical that makes tobacco so darn hard to quit, to help smokers smoke less.

The Food and Drug Administration has been for at least six years as one way to make it easier for smokers to cut back, if not quit entirely. Less than two years ago, it authorized 22nd Century Group, a publicly traded based in Buffalo, New York, to advertise its proprietary low-nicotine cigarettes as modified-risk tobacco products.

Now, the first authorized cigarettes with 95% less nicotine than traditional smokes are coming to California, Florida, and Texas in early July, after a year of test-marketing in Illinois and Colorado. It’s part of an aggressive rollout by 22nd Century that, by year’s end, could bring its products to 18 states 鈥� markets that together account for more than half of U.S. cigarette sales.

But anti-smoking groups oppose greenlighting 22nd Century’s products. Instead, they to expand on their original plan of setting a for all combustible cigarettes to make them minimally or nonaddictive. They expect the FDA to take the next step in that industrywide regulatory process as early as this fall.

“Unless and until there is a categorywide requirement that nicotine goes down to low, nonaddictive levels, this is not going to make a difference,” said Erika Sward, a spokesperson for the American Lung Association.

Major tobacco companies , , and did not respond to requests for comment.

Cigarette smoking is estimated to cause in the U.S., including from secondhand smoke, and contributes to tobacco use being the leading preventable cause of death nationally. In 2018, then-FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb wrote that setting a maximum nicotine level “could result in more than 8 million fewer tobacco-caused deaths through the end of the century – an undeniable public health benefit.”

The FDA reasoned that people would collectively smoke fewer cigarettes and have less exposure to the deadly toxins that are still present in low-nicotine cigarettes.

22nd Century says it used a patent-protected process to control nicotine biosynthesis in the tobacco plant, enabling it to create a pack of cigarettes with about as much nicotine as one Marlboro. It says generally that it uses “, including genetic engineering, gene-editing, and molecular breeding.”

Keeping 5% of the nicotine is enough to prevent smokers from seeking more to satisfy their craving, said , president of 22nd Century’s smoking division.

“There’s just enough in there that your brain thinks it’s getting it, but it’s not,” Miller said. “That was really one of the reasons we got to these levels of nicotine, is because you don’t have that additional smoking.”

Miller said the low-nicotine cigarettes can help some smokers cut back or quit, perhaps in conjunction with a nicotine patch or gum, when they’ve tried and failed with other stop-smoking programs.

Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids President Matthew L. Myers supports the development of an industrywide low-nicotine standard, saying the concept would work only if consumers no longer had the alternative of a higher-nicotine cigarette.

“The concern with a product that’s still addictive, but delivers low levels of nicotine, in fact is that consumers will smoke more, because the evidence shows that somebody who’s addicted will smoke enough to satisfy their craving,” Myers said.

Both the FDA and cited studies that found lower levels of nicotine don’t prompt smokers to smoke more to reach the same nicotine levels. But those studies assumed smokers wouldn’t have a high-nicotine alternative, anti-smoking groups and researchers said.

Allowing low-nicotine cigarettes while conventional cigarettes remain available may be a public health detriment if they discourage smokers from quitting entirely or encourage others to start smoking because they think there’s a safe way to experiment with cigarettes, the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids and several health associations wrote in a letter to reverse its 22nd Century decision.

22nd Century’s cigarettes are still dangerous, and consumers must substantially cut back or quit smoking to get health advantages. But anti-smoking groups fear many smokers won’t understand that.

“If people are looking at this as a magic bullet and are still continuing their tobacco use, they are not doing anything to change their risk,” said Sward, of the lung association.

Anti-smoking groups particularly object to allowing 22nd Century to market menthol cigarettes even as the FDA is considering outlawing such cigarettes nationwide.

FDA spokesperson Abby Capobianco confirmed that 22nd Century has the only FDA-authorized low-nicotine cigarette but did not respond to requests for comment on the FDA’s plans for regulating nicotine in cigarettes.

California already flavoring, and Miller said the company won’t challenge that state’s ban and won’t sell its menthol cigarettes in California.

But Miller hopes the company will eventually win an exemption from any federal ban, in part, he said, because more than half of menthol smokers are likely to switch to conventional cigarettes.

“That’s not what the FDA wants to happen,” Miller said. “They need an offramp for these menthol smokers and ours is obviously the natural.”

The company is expanding into California, Florida, and Texas because of the nation-leading size of . It plans to also begin selling its very low-nicotine, or VLN, cigarettes this year in Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah, and it may move into 10 more states.

The company is prioritizing seven states that offer tax incentives for products the FDA has said reduce tobacco risk, believing its cigarettes will have a price advantage over others in Colorado, Connecticut, Kentucky, Michigan, North Carolina, New Mexico, and Utah. Miller said the company may lobby California lawmakers to add similar incentives as part of the state’s extensive efforts to discourage smoking, which still addicts .

Miller declined to disclose the company’s market share from the two test states but said sales were above expectations.

“If we can get this to the level of, like, a nonalcoholic beer 鈥� you know, 3% to 5% of the category 鈥� it’s a game changer,” Miller said. “We know that there’s a latent demand in the market for this product.”

This article was produced by 杨贵妃传媒視頻 Health News, which publishes , an editorially independent service of the .听

杨贵妃传媒視頻 Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF鈥攁n independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .

USE OUR CONTENT

This story can be republished for free (details).

En cambio, la FDA permitió que todos los cigarrillos electrónicos permanecieran en el mercado mientras sus fabricantes solicitaban la autorización para comercializarlos.

Siete años después, el vapeo se ha disparado hasta convertirse en una industria de $8.2 mil millones, y los fabricantes están inundando el mercado con miles de productos que pueden ser mucho más adictivos, la mayoría vendidos ilegalmente y sin el permiso de la agencia federal.

“La FDA no ha logrado proteger la salud pública”, dijo Eric Lindblom, ex asesor del Centro de Productos de Tabaco de la FDA. “Es una tragedia”.

Sin embargo, la FDA no es la única entidad que ha tolerado la venta de vaporizadores a menores.

Múltiples actores dentro y fuera de Washington simplemente no hicieron nada, ataron las manos de la FDA o se negaron a proporcionarle los recursos necesarios. Los ex presidentes Barack Obama y Donald Trump impidieron que la agencia prohibiera ampliamente los vaporizadores con sabor a caramelo.

Mientras tanto, los vaporizadores de hoy se han vuelto “más grandes, más malos y más baratos” que los modelos más antiguos, dijo Robin Koval, director ejecutivo de Truth Initiative, un grupo de defensa del control del tabaco. La enorme cantidad de nicotina en los cigarrillos electrónicos (hasta en cinco años) puede volver adictos a los adolescentes en cuestión de días, explicó Koval.

Ahora, los cigarrillos electrónicos en los Estados Unidos contienen concentraciones de nicotina que, en promedio, son más del doble del nivel permitido en Canadá y . El país no establece límites en el contenido de nicotina de ningún producto de tabaco.

“Nunca antes habíamos tenido este nivel de nicotina”, dijo Matthew Myers, presidente de Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, que se opone al vapeo entre los jóvenes. “Realmente no conocemos las ”.

Elijah Stone tenía 19 años cuando probó su primer cigarrillo electrónico en una fiesta. Era un estudiante de primer año de la universidad, lidiando con depresión y trastorno por déficit de atención e hiperactividad, y “buscando un escape”. Los vendedores nunca le pidieron su identificación.

Stone dijo que se “enganchó al instante”.

“En el momento en que sentí ese zumbido, 驴cómo se suponía que iba a retroceder después de sentir eso?”, se preguntó retóricamente Stone, quien ahora tiene 23 años y vive en Los Ángeles.

La industria de los cigarrillos electrónicos sostiene que las concentraciones más altas de nicotina pueden ayudar a los adultos que fuman mucho a cambiar de cigarrillos combustibles a productos de vapeo, que son relativamente menos dañinos para ellos.

La FDA ha aprobado los cigarrillos electrónicos con sabor a tabaco y alto contenido de nicotina para ese propósito, dijo April Meyers, directora ejecutiva de la Smoke-Free Alternatives Trade Association.

“El objetivo es alejar a la gente de los productos combustibles”, dijo Nicolás Minas Alfaro, director ejecutivo de Puff Bar, una de las marcas más populares entre los menores el año pasado. Sin embargo, Alfaro reconoció: “Estos productos son productos adictivos; eso no se puede ocultar”.

Aunque este tipo de electrónicos no producen alquitrán, contienen sustancias químicas nocivas, como听 nicotina y formaldehído. El Cirujano General de Estados Unidos ha advertido que vapear presenta riesgos significativos, incluidos daños al , los y partes del cerebro que controlan la atención y el aprendizaje, así como un mayor riesgo de adicción a otras sustancias.

Más de 2,5 millones de niños y adolescentes , incluido el 14% de los estudiantes de secundaria, según los Centros para el Control y Prevención de Enfermedades (CDC).

En Estados Unidos, la mayoría de los vapeadores adolescentes comienzan a fumar , según una encuesta de usuarios de cigarrillos electrónicos de 16 a 19 años presentada en la Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco en marzo.

El potencial de ganancias, y , ha llevado a una fiebre del oro. La cantidad de productos de vapeo, medidos por sus códigos de barras, , pasando de 453 en junio de 2021 a 2,023 en junio de 2022, según una revisión de Truth Initiative de los datos de ventas minoristas del país.

Funcionarios de la FDA dicen estar abrumados por el volumen de aplicaciones para comercializar cigarrillos electrónicos: 26 millones en total.

“No existe una agencia reguladora en el mundo que haya tenido que lidiar con un volumen como este”, dijo Brian King, director del Centro de Productos de Tabaco de la FDA desde julio de 2022.

La agencia ha luchado para frenar a los fabricantes de cigarrillos electrónicos que continúan vendiendo vaporizadores a pesar del rechazo de los productos por parte de la FDA, así como a los fabricantes que nunca se molestaron en solicitar la autorización, y a los falsificadores que esperan ganar la mayor cantidad de dinero posible antes de que los clausuren.

En 2018, grupos de salud pública alegando que la demora en revisar las solicitudes ponía en riesgo a los niños. Aunque un tribunal ordenó a la FDA que terminara el trabajo para septiembre de 2021, la FDA . Se estima que 1,2 millones de menores de 21 años comenzaron a vapear durante el año siguiente, según en el American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

Recientemente, la FDA anunció que tomó decisiones sobre el de cigarrillos electrónicos, y señaló que rechazó millones y solo autorizó a 23. Todos los productos autorizados tienen sabores tradicionales de tabaco y se consideraron “apropiados para la protección de la salud pública” porque los productos con ese sabor no son populares entre los niños, pero brindan a los fumadores adultos una alternativa menos peligrosa, dijo King.

La agencia aún tiene que tomar decisiones finales sobre los productos más populares en el mercado. Esas solicitudes son más largas y necesitan una revisión científica más cuidadosa, dijo Mitch Zeller, ex director del Centro de Productos de Tabaco de la FDA y miembro actual de la junta asesora de Qnovia, que está desarrollando productos para dejar de fumar.

La FDA dijo que no completaría la revisión de las solicitudes para fines de junio, , pero que .

Antes de que la FDA pueda anunciar nuevas políticas sobre el tabaco, necesita la aprobación del presidente, quien no siempre está de acuerdo con las prioridades de la FDA.

Por ejemplo, en 2016, Obama rechazó la propuesta de los funcionarios de la FDA de prohibir los sabores aptos para niños.

Y en 2020, Trump dio marcha atrás en su propio plan de retirar del mercado la mayoría de los vaporizadores saborizados. En lugar de prohibir todos los sabores de frutas y menta, la administración Trump los prohibió . La prohibición de sabores no afectó a los vaporizadores sin cartuchos, como los cigarrillos electrónicos desechables.

El resultado fue predecible, dijo Zeller.

Los adolescentes de Juul a marcas que no se vieron afectadas por la prohibición, incluidos los vaporizadores desechables como , a los que se les permitió seguir vendiendo vaporizadores con sabor a caramelo.

Después de de la FDA el año pasado, Puff Bar ahora vende solo vaporizadores sin nicotina, dijo Alfaro.

Cuando la FDA intenta una acción audaz, los desafíos legales a menudo la obligan a frenar o incluso revertir el curso de acción.

Por ejemplo, la FDA del mercado en junio de 2022, pero inmediatamente se enfrentó a una demanda.

La Corte de Apelaciones de EE.UU. para el Circuito de DC se puso del lado de Juul y emitió una suspensión temporal de la orden de la FDA. En cuestión de semanas, la FDA anunció que postergaría la ejecución de su orden debido a “problemas científicos exclusivos de la aplicación de JUUL que justifican una revisión adicional”.

Los fabricantes de cigarrillos electrónicos Logic y R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. después de que la agencia les ordenara dejar de vender vaporizadores de mentol, un sabor popular entre los adolescentes. En ambos casos, las suspensiones impuestas por los tribunales frenaron las órdenes de la FDA pendientes de revisión y los productos mentolados de las empresas permanecen en el mercado.

Luis Pinto, vocero de la empresa matriz Reynolds American, dijo: “Seguimos confiando en la calidad de todas las aplicaciones de Reynolds, y creemos que existe amplia evidencia para que la FDA determine que la comercialización de estos productos es apropiada para la protección de la salud pública”.

Bajo la administración Biden, la FDA ha comenzado a intensificar los esfuerzos para cumplir con las normas. de cigarrillos electrónicos con más de $19,000 cada uno y emitió más de 1,500 cartas de advertencia a los fabricantes. También envió advertencias a 120,000 minoristas por vender productos ilegales o a clientes menores de 21 años, dijo King.

Cinco de las empresas que fabricaban vaporizadores decorados con personajes de dibujos animados, como los Minions, o tenían forma de juguetes, como Nintendo Game Boys o walkie-talkies.

En mayo, la FDA incluyó a Elfbar y otros vaporizadores no autorizados de China en su “lista roja”, lo que permite a detener en la frontera. El 22 de junio, la agencia anunció que había emitido cartas de advertencia a por vender productos de tabaco no autorizados, específicamente productos Elfbar y Esco Bars, y señaló que ambas marcas son cigarrillos electrónicos descartables que vienen en sabores conocidos por atraer a los jóvenes, incluidos chicle y limonada rosa.

En octubre, el Departamento de Justicia presentó por primera vez de cigarrillos electrónicos en nombre de la FDA, buscando “detener la fabricación y venta ilegales de productos de vapeo no autorizados”.

Algunos legisladores dicen que el Departamento de Justicia debería desempeñar un papel más importante en el enjuiciamiento de las empresas que venden cigarrillos electrónicos aptos para niños.

“No se equivoquen: hay más de seis fabricantes de cigarrillos electrónicos que venden sin autorización en el mercado”, dijo el senador Dick Durbin (demócrata de Illinois) en . Los menores están “vapeando con productos no autorizados que están en los estantes de las tiendas solo porque la FDA aparentemente ha otorgado un pase gratuito a estos cigarrillos electrónicos ilegales”.

杨贵妃传媒視頻 Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF鈥攁n independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .

USE OUR CONTENT

This story can be republished for free (details).

Instead, the FDA allowed all e-cigarettes already on the market to stay while their manufacturers applied for the OK to market them.

Seven years later, vaping has ballooned into an , and manufacturers are flooding the market with thousands of products 鈥� most sold illegally and without FDA permission 鈥� that can be far more addictive.

“The FDA has failed to protect public health,” said Eric Lindblom, a former senior adviser to the director of the FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products. “It’s a tragedy.”

Yet the FDA isn’t the only entity that has tolerated the selling of vapes to kids.

Multiple players in and out of Washington have declined to act, tied the agency’s hands, or neglected to provide the FDA with needed resources. Former Presidents Barack Obama and Donald Trump both have prevented the FDA from broadly banning candy-flavored vapes.

Meanwhile, today’s vapes have become “bigger, badder, and cheaper” than older models, said Robin Koval, CEO of the Truth Initiative, a tobacco control advocacy group. The enormous amount of nicotine in e-cigarettes 鈥� up 鈥� can addict kids in a matter of days, Koval said.

E-cigarettes in the U.S. now contain nicotine concentrations that are, on average, more than twice the level allowed in Canada and The U.S. sets no limits on the nicotine content of any tobacco product.

“We’ve never delivered this level of nicotine before,” said Matthew Myers, president of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, which opposes youth vaping. “We really implications.”

Elijah Stone was 19 when he tried his first e-cigarette at a party. He was a college freshman, grappling with depression and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and “looking for an escape.” Store clerks never asked for his ID.

Stone said he was “hooked instantly.”

“The moment I felt that buzz, how was I supposed to go back after I felt that?” asked Stone, now 23, of Los Angeles.

The e-cigarette industry maintains that higher nicotine concentrations can help adults who smoke heavily switch from combustible cigarettes to vaping products, which are relatively less harmful to them. The FDA has approved high-nicotine, tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes for that purpose, said April Meyers, CEO of the Smoke-Free Alternatives Trade Association.

“The goal is to get people away from combustible products,” said Nicholas Minas Alfaro, CEO of Puff Bar, one of the most popular brands with kids last year. Yet Alfaro acknowledged, “These products are addictive products; there’s no hiding that.”

Although e-cigarettes don’t produce tar, they do contain harmful chemicals, such as nicotine and formaldehyde. The U.S. Surgeon General has warned that vaping poses significant risks: including damage to , , and parts of the brain that control attention and learning, as well as an increased risk of addiction to other substances.

More than 2.5 million kids , including 14% of high school students, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Most U.S. teen vapers of waking up, according to a survey of e-cigarette users ages 16 to 19 presented at the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco in March.

The potential for profits 鈥� and 鈥� has led to a gold rush. The number of unique vaping products, as measured by their bar codes, , rising from 453 in June 2021 to 2,023 in June 2022, according to a Truth Initiative review of U.S. retail sales data.

FDA officials say they’ve been overwhelmed by the volume of e-cigarette marketing applications 鈥� 26 million in all.

“There is no regulatory agency in the world that has had to deal with a volume like that,” said Brian King, who became director of the FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products in July 2022.

The agency has struggled to stop e-cigarette makers who continue selling vapes despite the FDA’s rejection of the products, as well as manufacturers who never bothered to apply for authorization, and counterfeiters hoping to earn as much money as possible before being shut down.

In 2018, public health groups , charging that the delay in reviewing applications put kids at risk. Although a court ordered the FDA to finish the job by September 2021, the FDA . An estimated 1.2 million people under the legal age of 21 began vaping over the next year, according to a study in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

Recently, the FDA announced it has of e-cigarette applications, noting that it had rejected millions and authorized 23. All authorized products have traditional tobacco flavors, and were deemed “appropriate for the protection of public health” because tobacco-flavored products aren’t popular with children but provide adult smokers with a less dangerous alternative, King said.

The agency has yet to make final decisions on the most popular products on the market. Those applications are longer and need more careful scientific review, said Mitch Zeller, former director of the FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products and a current advisory board member for Qnovia, which is developing smoking-cessation products.

The FDA said it would not complete reviewing applications by the end of June, as it but would need

Before the FDA can announce new tobacco policies, it needs approval from the president 鈥� who doesn’t always agree with the FDA’s priorities.

For example, Obama rejected FDA officials’ proposal to ban kid-friendly flavors in 2016.

And in 2020, Trump backpedaled on his own plan to pull most flavored vapes off the market. Instead of banning all fruit and minty flavors, the Trump administration such as Juul. The flavor ban didn’t affect vapes without cartridges, such as disposable e-cigarettes.

The result was predictable, Zeller said.

Teens from Juul to brands that weren’t affected by the ban, including disposable vapes such as , which were allowed to continue selling candy-flavored vapes.

After letter from the FDA last year, Puff Bar now sells only zero-nicotine vapes, Alfaro said.

When the FDA does attempt bold action, legal challenges often force it to halt or even reverse course.

The FDA from the market in June 2022, for example, but was immediately hit with a lawsuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit sided with Juul and issued a temporary stay on the FDA’s order. Within weeks, the FDA announced it would hold off on enforcing its order because of “scientific issues unique to the JUUL application that warrant additional review.”

E-cigarette makers Logic and R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. both after the agency ordered them menthol vapes, a flavor popular with teens. In both cases, court-imposed stays halted the FDA’s orders pending review and the companies’ menthol products remain on the market.

Luis Pinto, a spokesperson for parent company Reynolds American, said, “We remain confident in the quality of all of Reynolds’ applications, and we believe that there is ample evidence for FDA to determine that the marketing of these products is appropriate for the protection of public health.”

Under the Biden administration, the FDA has begun to step up enforcement efforts. It more than $19,000 each, and has issued more than 1,500 warning letters to manufacturers. The FDA also issued warnings to 120,000 retailers for selling illegal products or selling to customers under 21, King said. Five of the companies that made vapes decorated with cartoon characters, such as Minions, or were shaped like toys, including Nintendo Game Boys or walkie-talkies.

In May, the FDA put Elfbar and other unauthorized vapes from China on its “red list,” which allows to without inspection at the border. On June 22, the FDA announced it has issued for selling unauthorized tobacco products, specifically Elfbar and Esco Bars products, noting that both brands are disposable e-cigarettes that come in flavors known to appeal to youth, including bubblegum and pink lemonade.

In October, the Justice Department for the first time against six e-cigarette manufacturers on behalf of the FDA, seeking “to stop the illegal manufacture and sale of unauthorized vaping products.”

Some lawmakers say the Justice Department should play a larger role in prosecuting companies selling kid-friendly e-cigarettes.

“Make no mistake: There are more than six e-cigarette manufacturers selling without authorization on the market,” Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said in a . Children are “vaping with unauthorized products that are on store shelves only because FDA has seemingly granted these illegal e-cigarettes a free pass.”

杨贵妃传媒視頻 Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF鈥攁n independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .

USE OUR CONTENT

This story can be republished for free (details).

Yet even in a year consumed by sickness, they’re considering significant 鈥� sometimes controversial 鈥� health policy measures that aren’t directly related to COVID-19.

Much of this legislation predates the pandemic, having lacked the support to win approval in previous years. Now, the bills are making significant progress because they underwent rigorous vetting in the past. That puts them steps ahead in a year with little time for deliberation or debate.

They include bills to ban the sale of flavored tobacco products, such as menthol cigarettes and vaping liquids; allow California to develop its own brand of generic drugs; enhance the state attorney general’s power to ; and allow to practice independently.

“Some of these bills, which have pretty far-reaching effects, may just sweep through because [lawmakers are] trying to get out of here by the end of August,” said Garry South, a Democratic political strategist.

The California legislature has had a bizarre year. Lawmakers left town abruptly in March to comply with lockdown orders and then again in July when some Assembly members tested positive for COVID-19, cutting the legislative session short.

The reduced time means most policy committees scheduled fewer hearings in the last weeks of the session to debate bills. Because of COVID-19 restrictions, most witnesses are giving testimony over the phone and in video conferences, lawmakers are unable to have informal meetings in the hallways, and advocates have less opportunity to lobby officials.

Lawmakers face an Aug. 31 deadline to send bills to Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has until the end of September to sign or veto them.

Given the shortened time frame for voting and deliberation, legislative leaders repeatedly asked committee chairs and members of their houses to reduce their legislative load, focusing on the most pressing challenges, like COVID-19 and wildfires. Despite those directives, most officials acknowledge a need to address more than those issues this year.

“We have the capacity to do many different things, and there are many things we must tend to in this state,” Newsom said at a press conference in late July. “I look forward to signing many bills that the legislature sends down.”

Passage is not guaranteed in the last three chaotic weeks of the legislative session, but the following major health care bills have made it through one house of the legislature and are working their way through committees in the second chamber.

• SB-977 would give the attorney general new authority to between large for-profit hospitals, private equity firms and physicians’ groups. Attorney General Xavier Becerra has been working on this legislation for years in the face of strong opposition from hospitals.
• SB-793 is an enormously controversial bill that would go beyond the on flavors in vape cartridges, which excludes menthol and tobacco flavors. This measure would ban the sale of most flavored tobacco products statewide, including menthol cigarettes, an idea that has died and been resurrected in many forms in both the Senate and Assembly.
• AB-890 represents another long-standing Capitol feud, with the powerful doctor lobby opposing. The measure would 鈥� nurses with advanced degrees and training 鈥� to practice medicine in some cases without oversight from a physician.
• SB-852 would establish a state office that would contract with drug manufacturers to produce or distribute low-cost generic drugs in California. Newsom floated the idea in January.

It’s not an accident that such weighty bills are the ones left standing after legislators were asked to slash their portfolio of bills this year, said Sen. Richard Pan (D-Sacramento), who chairs the Senate Health Committee.

When Pan culled the bills his committee would consider, he eliminated measures with unresolved questions, he said, because administration officials dealing with the pandemic were less available to testify as witnesses and lawmakers were unable to work closely with one another in the Capitol.

“Is this something that needs to be done this year?” Pan said he asked himself.

That means many of the bills moving through his committee and other policy committees are largely the ones that have been scrutinized in previous years, Pan said.

“We spent a lot of time working through those issues and trying to get those all resolved for the committee,” Pan added.

But South warned that even legislation that has been heard in the past deserves the full debate and deliberation that would take place in a typical year.

“I don’t think the process is set up this year to be passing major legislation that affects major sections of society without adequate input from stakeholders and the general public,” he said.

Some lawmakers are keeping other measures alive by using the pandemic to sharpen pitches for their pre-COVID bills, with the refrain “Now more than ever.” Sure, the bill was important when it was introduced in February, they argue, but “now more than ever” it really has to pass.

“You’ve got legislators not used to having so many of their bills threatened,” said Rob Stutzman, a Republican political consultant. “It’s not surprising they’d be trying to adapt their proposals to the narrowed purview of this session, which is obviously COVID-related.”

Sen. Jerry Hill (D-San Mateo), author of the tobacco flavor bill, is employing this tactic.

“I know we’ve all had to reassess our priorities,” Hill said at an Assembly committee hearing. “Yet emerging evidence about smoking and COVID-19 suggests smoking can put people at greater risk.”

Another example of the “Now more than ever” trend is SB-855, a “mental health parity” bill that would strengthen requirements for private health insurance to cover medically necessary treatment for mental illnesses.

“Even before COVID, mental health and addiction were major crises in this country,” but the pandemic is making the crises worse, the bill’s author, Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco), said at a press conference last week. “People who were stable with their mental health are now losing stability.”

That’s not to say using COVID-19 as justification to pass a bill is just a gimmick; some problems really have gotten worse since the start of the pandemic, said Larry Levitt, executive vice president of health policy at KFF. (KHN, which produces California Healthline, is an editorially independent program of the Kaiser Family Foundation.)

“Mental health is a perfect example of the pandemic exacerbating problems that were already there,” he said.

Wiener’s measure has survived the Senate and several committees, but other lawmakers haven’t seen the same success.

Assembly member Adrin Nazarian (D-Van Nuys) lobbied hard for AB-2203, which would have capped out-of-pocket payments for insulin. Nazarian pointed to from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that showed 40% of people who died of COVID-19 had diabetes.

His bill sailed through the Assembly but wasn’t given a hearing in the Senate. He said he followed directions from leadership to reduce the number of bills he was carrying, paring them down from about 25 to fewer than 10.

“Without a pandemic, this was a straightforward bill that would protect consumers and curb health care costs,” Nazarian said. “I’m extremely upset and frustrated about this.”

This story was produced by听, which publishes听, an editorially independent service of the听.

杨贵妃传媒視頻 Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF鈥攁n independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .

USE OUR CONTENT

This story can be republished for free (details).